Pangolin vs Cassandra
Cassandra and Pangolin both bring Bayesian Marketing Mix Modelling to teams without a data science function, but they hand you different amounts of the work. Cassandra is a no-code builder you configure and run yourself. Pangolin is a managed system that models your data and generates the budget recommendation for you.
Who's each platform for?
Direct Capability Mapping
| Capability | Pangolin | Cassandra |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Measurement Foundations | ||
| Marketing Mix Modelling | Core, Bayesian (proprietary), managed | Core, Bayesian (built on Meta's Robyn), self-configured |
| Incrementality testing | Built into the contribution model | Available (GeoMatch geo-experiments) for calibration |
| Model ownership | Modelled and maintained by Pangolin | Built and configured by the user via a no-code UI |
| Refresh cadence | Continuous | Regular (weekly to monthly, depending on plan) |
| 2. Action & Optimisation | ||
| Budget optimisation | AI-generated recommendations, core feature | Budget Allocator tool, user-run scenario simulation |
| Autonomous execution | Yes, core (human-approved) | Not core — recommendations are actioned manually |
| Profit focus | Core contribution profit optimisation | Not a primary focus (primarily revenue/ROI-based) |
| 3. Product & Audience Fit | ||
| Target user | Marketing leaders, zero data science required | Marketers and agencies comfortable with configuration |
| Vertical focus | DTC and ecommerce specifically | Broad (DTC, B2B, Higher Ed, Charity, Fintech) |
| Setup approach | Managed, fully automated pipeline | Self-service, no-code model builder |
| Agency support | Not a current focus | Dedicated agency workspaces and bespoke pricing |
Two contrasting approaches to measurement
Where Pangolin is different
From data to a better budget decision
Pangolin vs Cassandra Comparison FAQ
How does Pangolin compare with Cassandra?
Cassandra is a no-code MMM builder that marketers or agencies configure and run themselves. Pangolin is a managed platform that models your data and generates an AI-driven, contribution-profit-optimised budget recommendation automatically.
Do I need to build my own model with Pangolin, like with Cassandra?
No. Pangolin's model is built and maintained for you once your data is connected, without a configuration step.
Which platform is better for DTC brands?
DTC and ecommerce brands wanting a managed, profit-optimised recommendation without configuring a model themselves tend to fit Pangolin better. Brands or agencies wanting direct, no-code control over their own MMM, or operating outside DTC/ecommerce, may prefer Cassandra.
Is Cassandra's no-code approach more transparent than Pangolin's?
Building your own model in a no-code UI does give direct visibility into its configuration. Pangolin trades that hands-on configuration for a managed model and an automatically generated recommendation, which suits teams who'd rather not own the modelling process themselves.
Does Pangolin support agencies managing multiple clients, like Cassandra?
Not as a current focus. Cassandra's agency-specific workspaces and pricing are built for that use case; Pangolin is built for a single growth-stage DTC or ecommerce brand.
Skip the model building. Get straight to the budget decision.
See what an automated, profit-optimised recommendation looks like for your own brand.
Book a demo